Emmanuel Macron at an official European meeting on 26 June 2025
Emmanuel Macron at an official European meeting on 26 June 2025. Photo: European Union. Source: European Union / Wikimedia Commons.

Fact-check status: Updated 2 August 2026, 5:00 p.m. Paris time. This is an interim editorial assessment: Emmanuel Macron’s second presidential term is still in progress.

France entered the Macron era as a tourism superpower. Nearly a decade later, it remains the world’s most visited country, has crossed the symbolic threshold of 100 million international visitors and is earning more from tourism than at any previous point. That sounds like a decisive victory. It is also only half the story.

The harder question is not whether French tourism performed well. It did. The question is how much of that performance can reasonably be attributed to presidential policy, how much came from France’s inherited cultural and geographic advantages, and which structural weaknesses the government still failed to resolve.

By Osama Samaha, Editor-in-Chief, OUISTARS Travel Magazine. Part of the OUISTARS Tourism Accountability series.

The record behind the headline

Official figures released in February 2026 put France at 102 million international visitors in 2025, up from 100 million in 2024. International tourism receipts reached a record €77.5 billion, 9% higher than a year earlier, while the travel balance produced a €20.1 billion surplus. Domestic tourism consumption reached €222 billion.

Those figures matter. Tourism is not a decorative branch of the French economy: it sustains accommodation, restaurants, transport, culture, retail, events and hundreds of local supply chains. Yet arrival numbers alone cannot measure the quality of a tourism policy. Visitor spending, length of stay, working conditions, regional distribution, accessibility and environmental cost matter just as much.

What Macron’s governments can legitimately claim

1. The pandemic rescue prevented a far deeper collapse

The strongest point in the record is also the least glamorous. During 2020 and 2021, the state and its operators deployed €45.5 billion in support for tourism businesses. The French Court of Accounts found that 98% of companies in scope received at least one form of assistance. The measures compensated 88% of lost gross operating surplus and reduced business failures by almost 44% compared with 2019.

This intervention did not create France’s tourism appeal. It helped preserve the companies, jobs and operating capacity needed for the recovery. Employment fell by only 0.4% between the end of 2019 and the end of 2021, despite an extraordinary 46% fall in sector turnover across the crisis period.

That is a substantive achievement. Any fair assessment of the Macron years must recognise that the government protected a fragmented industry that includes family hotels, cafés, tour operators, cultural venues, event organisers, airlines and major hospitality groups.

2. Destination France created a national strategic framework

Announced in 2021, the ten-year Destination France strategy was backed by €1.9 billion for 2022 to 2024. Its stated goals included improving service quality, supporting digital and environmental transition, strengthening skills, diversifying destinations and maintaining France’s position as the leading international destination.

The plan helped move tourism closer to the centre of economic policy. Presidential Destination France summits brought public authorities together with major investors and industry leaders. Later initiatives, including France Tourisme Tech, created a structured route for start-ups working on visitor flows, hospitality technology, mobility and decarbonisation.

The ambition was relevant. The more difficult question is whether every part of it was executed with the same urgency as the promotional and investment agenda.

3. France converted major events into international visibility

The 2023 Rugby World Cup, the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games, the 80th anniversary of D-Day and the reopening of Notre-Dame gave France an exceptional sequence of global moments. Government, local authorities and private operators used them to promote the destination, renew infrastructure and test large-scale visitor management.

The Olympic effect should not be exaggerated: some museums and tourism businesses experienced displacement during the Games, and parts of the summer were weaker than expected. Nevertheless, France reached 100 million international visitors in 2024, followed by 102 million in 2025. The post-Games year therefore produced consolidation rather than a simple one-off peak.

Readers planning around major events can consult the OUISTARS France Tourism and Events Calendar 2026–2027.

4. Tourism generated more value

International receipts rose from €58 billion in 2019 to €71 billion in 2024 and €77.5 billion in 2025. Average spending by an international visitor reached approximately €760 per trip. Investment also accelerated after the pandemic, averaging about €21 billion a year between 2022 and 2024, according to the government’s 2025 tourism review.

This is important because France had long been criticised for leading the world in arrivals while capturing less spending than competing destinations. The gap has not disappeared, but the direction of travel improved.

Where the record remains incomplete

1. France still converts visitors into less revenue than Spain

France welcomed more international visitors than any other country in 2025, but official French reporting acknowledged that Spain generated about €105 billion in international tourism receipts, compared with France’s €77.5 billion. Different national methodologies require caution, yet the scale of the gap cannot be dismissed.

The economic objective should not be to push every visitor to spend more at any cost. It should be to encourage longer stays, better geographic distribution, locally retained expenditure and experiences that justify value without weakening accessibility.

2. The green transformation did not match the rescue effort

The Court of Accounts concluded that the emergency measures preserved the sector but produced only limited digital and ecological transformation. Small equipment upgrades and a €500 digital voucher did not create the structural shift originally promised.

The government now aims to make France the world’s leading sustainable destination by 2030. But transport accounts for 69% of tourism’s carbon footprint, and 80% of tourism activity is concentrated on 20% of the territory. Campaigns promoting lower-carbon mobility are useful; they are not a substitute for measurable change in transport, accommodation, water use and visitor distribution.

3. Success remains geographically concentrated

Paris, the Mediterranean coast, the Alps and a limited group of celebrated destinations absorb a disproportionate share of demand. This creates congestion and housing pressure in some places while other territories struggle to turn heritage, landscapes and local expertise into year-round economic activity.

Destination France promised diversification. The result remains uneven. The next stage must connect marketing with rail access, investable projects, professional distribution and commercially viable products outside the usual tourism map.

4. Labour shortages expose the human weakness of the model

The hospitality and restaurant sectors continue to report recruitment difficulties. The problem is not simply a lack of applicants. Seasonal housing, working hours, pay, career progression and retention all shape whether France can deliver the service expected by 102 million visitors.

A country cannot indefinitely promise premium experiences while treating tourism employment as a secondary policy issue. Training campaigns help, but the deeper test is whether the jobs become attractive enough to keep skilled people.

5. Tourism for all remains an unfinished promise

Government strategy itself acknowledges that roughly one in four French residents does not take a holiday each year. A tourism policy cannot be judged only by foreign exchange earnings and luxury hotel investment. Physical accessibility, affordable holidays, rail connectivity and the ability of residents to enjoy their own country belong in the same scorecard.

Macron did not create French tourism

France’s performance is the result of assets accumulated over generations: heritage, museums, gastronomy, coastlines, mountains, a global capital, transport infrastructure and a dense network of private businesses and public institutions. Municipalities, regions, Atout France, airport and rail operators, hotel employees, restaurateurs and entrepreneurs all contributed.

Presidential policy matters because it can protect the industry, set investment priorities, reform regulation and coordinate national ambition. It does not own every positive outcome. The same rule applies to criticism: a weak season caused by weather, exchange rates or international conflict cannot automatically be presented as a failure of the Élysée.

OUISTARS Tourism Accountability Score

Interim score: 67 out of 100. This is an editorial assessment, not an official ranking. It measures policy ambition, execution, measurable results, economic value, territorial distribution, sustainability and transparency.

  • Ambition: 8/10. Destination France set a clear global and sustainable ambition.
  • Execution: 19/25. Emergency support and major-event coordination were strong; structural delivery was less consistent.
  • Measurable results: 20/25. Arrivals, receipts and the travel surplus reached record levels.
  • Economic value and employment: 10/15. Value improved, but labour quality and the revenue gap with Spain remain concerns.
  • Territorial distribution: 4/10. Tourism continues to be heavily concentrated.
  • Sustainability: 3/10. The ambition is prominent; evidence of system-wide transformation remains limited.
  • Transparency: 3/5. More environmental and investment data are now available, but attribution and comparable outcome measures need improvement.

OUISTARS editorial verdict

The Macron years preserved French tourism at the moment of greatest danger and helped turn international events into renewed economic momentum. But they did not finish the harder transformation: converting leadership in visitor numbers into broader value, better work, stronger regional distribution and demonstrably sustainable growth.

OUISTARS Travel Magazine

The fairest conclusion is neither triumph nor failure. It is a consequential rescue followed by a partial transformation. France enters the final phase of Macron’s presidency stronger in arrivals and receipts, yet still carrying several of the weaknesses that Destination France was designed to address.

Tourism confidence also depends on public safety and operational reliability. Read the related OUISTARS analysis: No Security. No Tourism. No Economy.

Methodology and official sources

OUISTARS reviewed government tourism balances, Atout France reporting, the Destination France framework and the Court of Accounts evaluation of pandemic support. Results achieved during a presidential term are not automatically attributed to the president; the article distinguishes policy decisions from market performance and inherited destination strengths.

Frequently asked questions

Did Emmanuel Macron make France the world’s most visited country?

No. France was already a global tourism leader before 2017. Policies during Macron’s presidency supported recovery, investment and promotion, but the result also reflects long-established national assets and the work of public and private operators.

How many international visitors did France receive in 2025?

The French government and Atout France reported 102 million international visitors in 2025, compared with 100 million in 2024.

How much did France earn from international tourism in 2025?

Official reporting placed international tourism receipts at €77.5 billion in 2025, an increase of 9% from 2024.

What was the biggest tourism achievement of the Macron years?

OUISTARS considers the pandemic rescue the clearest achievement. Public support preserved companies and employment, enabling a rapid recovery when travel restrictions ended.

What remains unresolved?

France still faces a revenue gap with Spain, geographic concentration, labour shortages, affordability concerns and an incomplete environmental transition.

OUISTARS travel planning: Travellers arranging a trip in France can review OUISTARS private chauffeur and luxury transportation services for airport meet-and-greet, hotel transfers and tailored journeys.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here